First
I wanted to thank Mr. Solo for pointing out that Bush
does not represent us, the American People. The world
would do well to remember that we protested the war
and that anti-Americanism doesn't equal anti-Imperialism
anymore than hating protestents equals Irish republicanism.
Marty
writes in his piece "Inductive Writing Doesn't
Make it So" that comrade O Comain was "99%
wrong". Unfortunately for the rest of the unenlightened,
he doesn't offer a single piece of evidence to support
this claim.
The
issue of Gerry Armani and co. staying at fancy hotels,
associating with an American President, etc stems
from the fact that their flock is out there throwing
rocks at the RUC, going hungry, watching their hospitals
disappear, taking part in protests and suffering for
the cause. Meanwhile the leadership is in digs more
comfortable than most "rich" Americans will
ever experience.
The
Good Friday Agreement and the new assembly aren't
based on "American rights". Contrary to
what is preached in the states, what is pursued in
the north currently is consensus and consent, not
democracy. And just to clear things up, yes, associating
openly with the world's leader of imperialism (whether
you call it humanitarian intervention or not isn't
the point) isn't consistent with being an Irish freedom
fighter.
You
say we should stick together or "hang".
But what if sticking together and following said leaders
leads us to hang? It seems history would argue the
latter.
Index: Current Articles + Latest News and Views + Book Reviews +
Letters + Archives

|